Yes, software to track EAA compliance exists in the form of accessibility management platforms. These tools log accessibility issues identified through audits and scans, assign remediation tasks, monitor progress against WCAG 2.1 AA (the technical standard referenced by the European Accessibility Act), and generate reports that document conformance work. Pricing varies widely based on features, scope, and whether the platform is audit-based or scan-based. Most organizations pair platform software with professional services because software alone cannot identify the majority of accessibility issues.
| Key Point | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Software category | Accessibility management platforms track issues, assign remediation, and report on WCAG 2.1 AA conformance progress. |
| Technical standard | The EAA references EN 301 549, which incorporates WCAG 2.1 Level AA for web content. |
| Scan coverage | Automated scans flag approximately 25% of issues. The remaining 75% requires manual evaluation. |
| Pricing range | Platform subscriptions vary by features, user seats, and whether services are bundled with the software. |
| Typical pairing | Software plus an accessibility audit (starting at 1,000 dollars and ranging to 3,000 dollars) plus ongoing remediation work. |
What EAA Compliance Tracking Software Does
The European Accessibility Act went into effect on June 28, 2025. It applies to businesses that sell certain products and services into the EU market, including e-commerce, banking, e-readers, and ticketing services. The technical standard for digital conformance is EN 301 549, which incorporates WCAG 2.1 AA.
Accessibility management platforms are software applications built to help organizations track WCAG conformance. They centralize issue logs, assign remediation tasks to developers, store evidence of fixes, and produce progress reports. For EAA work, a platform organized around WCAG 2.1 AA mirrors the structure of EN 301 549 for web content, which makes documentation cleaner.
What Software Tracks Well
Platforms shine at the management layer. Once accessibility issues are loaded into the system, the software keeps the work organized across pages, screens, teams, and time. Common capabilities include:
- Issue tracking: Each issue is logged with its location, WCAG criterion, severity, and remediation status.
- Progress dashboards: Visual reports show conformance percentage by project, team, or product.
- Scheduled scans: Recurring automated checks flag regressions on previously remediated pages.
- VPAT and ACR documentation: Some platforms generate Accessibility Conformance Reports from tracked audit data.
- Role-based access: Auditors, developers, and project leads see the views relevant to their work.
What Software Cannot Do Alone
Software does not produce EAA conformance on its own. Accessibility scans evaluate HTML, CSS, and ARIA attributes against a subset of WCAG success criteria. They identify approximately 25% of accessibility issues. The remaining 75% requires manual evaluation that includes screen reader testing, keyboard testing, code inspection, and visual review.
For EAA work, this distinction matters. EN 301 549 covers criteria that automated checks cannot assess: meaningful sequence, name and role for custom components, focus order, error identification context, and others. A platform fed only by scan data will show a misleading conformance picture. A platform fed by audit data reflects real conformance status.
Pricing Factors
Platform pricing depends on several variables: number of users, number of projects or domains, whether scans are included, whether AI features are bundled, and whether professional services come with the subscription. Some platforms charge per user. Others charge per project or per scanned URL.
The total cost of an EAA program almost always exceeds the software line item. Most accessibility audits start at 1,000 dollars and range to 3,000 dollars per audit, depending on page count and complexity. Code remediation work, technical support hours, and any ACR documentation add to the total. Buyers evaluating software should compare the full program cost, not the subscription fee alone.
What to Look For
When evaluating software to track EAA compliance, several quality indicators separate professional-grade platforms from basic scan dashboards:
Audit-based versus scan-based architecture. Platforms built around full audit data reflect real WCAG conformance. Platforms built only on scan output show partial coverage and overstate progress.
WCAG 2.1 AA alignment. The platform should map issues to specific success criteria so documentation lines up with EN 301 549.
Prioritization by user impact and risk. Not all issues are equal. Software that ranks issues helps teams remediate what matters first.
Transparent reporting. Reports should specify the issue, the location, the affected criterion, and the remediation step. Vague conformance scores without underlying detail are not useful evidence.
Monitoring on a schedule. Recurring scans catch regressions between full audits and keep tracking data current.
Software as One Component of an EAA Program
Software to track EAA compliance is real and useful, but it works best as one part of a program that also includes a thorough audit, structured remediation, and recurring evaluation. Buyers shopping for a platform alone often discover later that the software cannot generate conformance on its own. The value of tracking software grows in direct proportion to the quality of the audit data behind it.