An EN 301 549 evaluation typically costs between $1,000 and $3,000 for most websites and web applications. The final price depends on how many pages or screens need to be evaluated, the complexity of the product, and whether additional deliverables like an Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) are included.
| Key Point | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Typical Range | $1,000 to $3,000 for most web properties |
| Per-Page Pricing | $100 to $250 per page or screen evaluated |
| ACR Add-On | An EN 301 549 edition ACR adds approximately $650 to the total |
| Scope Drives Cost | More pages, interactive components, and authenticated flows increase the price |
How EN 301 549 Evaluation Pricing Breaks Down
Most accessibility service providers price evaluations on a per-page or per-screen basis. For an EN 301 549 evaluation, expect $100 to $250 per unique page or screen. A 10-page marketing site falls at the lower end of the range, while a 20-screen web application with forms, dashboards, and dynamic content will cost more.
The evaluation itself involves screen reader testing, keyboard testing, visual inspection, and code inspection. Automated scans are included as one component, but they only flag approximately 25% of issues. The remaining work requires human evaluation against the EN 301 549 standard.
What Adds to the EN 301 549 Evaluation Cost
Several factors push pricing above or below the typical range. Products with authenticated user flows require evaluators to work within active sessions, which takes more time. Complex interactive components like data tables, multi-step forms, or custom widgets each require individual assessment.
Does an ACR Change the Price?
Yes. Many organizations pursuing EN 301 549 conformance need a completed ACR to present during procurement. The EN 301 549 edition ACR costs approximately $650 on top of the evaluation itself. This is higher than a WCAG-only ACR because the EN 301 549 standard covers additional requirements beyond Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 AA, including criteria for software, hardware, and documentation.
The ACR documents conformance findings in a standardized format that procurement teams and regulators expect. Without one, an organization may have evaluation results but no formal documentation to share with buyers or partners.
EN 301 549 vs. WCAG-Only Evaluation Costs
A WCAG-only evaluation and an EN 301 549 evaluation overlap significantly, since EN 301 549 incorporates WCAG 2.1 AA. The difference is that EN 301 549 includes additional criteria for non-web ICT products and services. For a standard website, the evaluation cost is similar. For software products or platforms with non-web components, the EN 301 549 evaluation may cost 10% to 25% more due to the expanded scope.
Organizations selling into the European market or preparing for the European Accessibility Act often need the EN 301 549 edition specifically, making the additional cost a practical requirement rather than an optional upgrade.
Budget for the evaluation scope that matches the product and the market it serves, and factor in the ACR if procurement documentation is part of the goal.